2014, no. 2
ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC AND TEACHING STAFF

Hypothesis: HAC is able to enrich scientific community not only with “recommendations”, but also with academic freedoms

L.I. Lourie

pp. 41–4880 RUB

PDF

Bookmark

Abstract

Analyzed are conditions in the sphere of defence of scientific dissertations. Peculiar attention is paid to the role of higher attestation commission (HAC) in that process. Possible recommendations are formulated to make better the work of the system of attestation of scientific cadres.

References

  1. [Electronic resource].
    ru.wikipedia.org
  2. Gessen, I.S. Fundamentals of Pedagogics. Introduction into applied philosophy. — M.: Shkola-Press Publ., 1995. — 448 p.
  3. [Electronic resource].
    bdn-steiner.ru
  4. Guberman, I. Garics for every day. — Vol. I. — M.: MP “EMIA”, 1992. — P. 51.
  5. Kuznetsova, V.Yu. Eros & Civilization. Single-measured person: Research in ideology of developed industrial society. — M.: AST, 2002. — 526 p.
  6. Porus, V.N. Render habitable catastrophe. Modern noted on spiritual culture of Russia // Problems of Philosophy. — 2005. — No. 11. — P. 24–36.
  7. Smolin, O. Tendencies and contradictions of educational policy // Popular Education. — 2003. — No. 6. — P. 11.
  8. Feldstein, D.I. Perspectives of psychological and pedagogical science and the problem of cadres’ attestation // Pedagogics. — 2013. — No. 2. — P. 7.
  9. [URL]: http://filosof.historic.ru/enc/item/f00/s00/ a000028.shtml
    filosof.historic.ru