2014, no. 11
HUMANIZATION AND LIBERALIZATION OF EDUCATION

Modus vivendi of linguistic and mathematical education

V.A. Erovenko

pp. 78–8380 RUB

PDF

Bookmark

Abstract

Substantiated is necessity of presence of mathematical component in university linguistic education. Formulated is the problem of dialog between “two cultures” of both mathematician and linguist.

References

  1. Gasparov, M.L. Records & Extracts. — M.: New literature review, 2001.
  2. Kholschtschevnikov, V. Versification vs. mathematics // Community of sciences and secrets of creativity. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1968. — P. 384—396.
  3. Grinbaum, O.N. A.S. Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin”: rhythmic meaning commentary. — SPb.: SPbGU, 2010.
  4. Tom, R. Topology & Linguistics // Successes of mathematical sciences. — 1975. — Vol. 30. — Iss. 1. — P. 199—221.
  5. Manin, Yu.I. Mathematics as metaphor. — M.: MTsNMO, 2008.
  6. Gladky, A.V. On exact and mathematical methods in linguistics and other humane sciences // Problems of linguistics. — 2007. — No. 5. — P. 22—38.
  7. Dobrushin, R.L. Mathematical methods in linguistics // Mathematical education. — 1961. — Iss. 6. — P. 37—60.
  8. Tselischtschev, V.V., Silantiev, I.V. Metaphoric presentation of mathematical knowledge // Vestnik MGU. Ser.: Philosophy. — 2010. — Vol. 8. — P. 5—20.
  9. Erovenko, V.A. Fundamentals of further mathematics for linguists: methodical notes with examples. — Minsk.: BGU, 2006.
  10. Timofeeva, M.K. Educational methodical complex of “Mathematical methods in philology” (for students of humanita rian faculty). — Novosibirsk: NGU, 2011.