Abstract
Researched is the problem of post-modernism. Contrary to popular belief about negative pathos of post-modern, it is necessary to point out deep fallacy of this approach and to demonstrate evidence base for justification of different point of view. Well-known problematic body of post-modernism requires slightly different interpretation in connection with change in position of post-modern itself. The author sees in post-modern not the end of the past, but the beginning of new era, the most important points for formation of which should be considered: analysis of the situation of person and his identification, immanent uncertainty and ontological dumbness and grand textualization of everything.
Keywords
- modern
- text
- information
- knowledge
- identification
- structuralism
- post-structuralism
- textualization
- narrativization
References
- Hassan, I. URL: http://culturolog.ru/content/view/2765/
- Scholes, R. Structuralism in literature: Introduction. New-Haven, 1974.
- Culler, J. On deconstruction: Theory a criticism after structuralism. London, 1983.
- Iser, W. Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie asthetischer Wirkung. Munhen, 1976.
- Brooks, C. The well wrought turn: Studies in the structure of poetry. New York, 1947.
- Childish, B., Thomson, Ch. Remodernism. Supplanting the Post-modernism. New York–New Delhi–Sydney. 2015.
- Anderson, P. Origins of post-modernism. Moscow, 2011.
