Abstract
Innovative way of society development should be based not on another piece of formal educational standards but on accumulating personality knowledge, aiming at understanding and developing creative capability while learning. It is possible only with the allowance of experience and traditions of oral education. Nowadays the dominated system of letter education aimed only at practical skills transferring to the prejudice of developing person creative ability.
Keywords
- education
- understanding
- oral–and–poetic thinking
- creativity
- anthropological continuity
References
- Putilov B.N. Folklore and folk culture; In memoriam. — St. Petersburg, 2003. (In Russian).
- Polani M. Personal Knowledge: Towards Post-Critical Philosophy. — Moscow, 1985. (In Russian).
- Dolzhenko O.V., Tarasova O.I. Education as mass media // Higher education in Russia. — 2009. — No 4. — P. 12 — 18. (In Russian).
- Lobok A.M. Anthropology of myth. — Yekaterinburg, 1997. (In Russian).
- Chistov K.V. Specificity of folklore in the light of the theory of information // Questions of philosophy. — 1972. — No 6. — P. 108 — 118. (In Russian).
- Lobok A.M. Content of education: conflict of paradigms // Changes. — 2000. — No 3. — P. 23 — 34. (In Russian).
- Popov A.A. Socio-Philosophical Foundations of Contemporary Open-Education Practices. Author’s abstract of Dr. Sci. (Philosophy) dissertation. Tomsk, 2009. (In Russian).
- Eko U. From the Internet to Guttenberg: Text and Hypertext // New Literary Review. — 1998. — No. 32. (In Russian).
- Kiyashchenko N.I. Aesthetic education as a way of formation of personality (synergetic context) // Questions of philosophy. — 2010. — No 3. — P. 172 — 176. (In Russian).
- Gusev S.S. The meaning of the possible. Connotational semantics. — St. Petersburg, 2002. (In Russian).