2009, no. 10
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION

Can Education Become a Support for the New Generation? (Conclusion)

L.I. Lure

pp. 30–35ARTICLE_TYPE legacy_no_front_matter80 RUB

PDF

Bookmark
Full text is not available for this article.

References

  1. Mukushev B.A. Problems of formation of nonlinear style of thinking of the personality // Alma mater (Higher School Bulletin). — 2009. — No. 4. — P. 16. (In Russian).
  2. Kantor K.M. Foci of history // Questions of philosophy. — 2009. — No. 3. — P. 52. (In Russian).
  3. Kruglov A.G. Alphabet on the break of millennia // The first of September. — 2007. — No. 42. (In Russian).
  4. Dewey, J. Democracy and Education: Pedagogy-Press, 2000, p. 114. (In Russian).
  5. Arev A. When adolescent self-will becomes the norm of culture // The first of September. — 2007. — No. 2. (In Russian).
  6. Korsak K. Do we need comparative pedagogy? // Public education. — 2003. — No. 8. — P. 41. (In Russian).
  7. Pasternak B. Dr. Zhivago. Autobiographical prose. Selected Letters. — Moscow: Goodyal Press, 1998. P. 684. (In Russian).
  8. Blyumerants M. In Search of Name and Face. Phenomenology of the Modern Landscape // Questions of Philosophy. — 2007. — No. 1. — P. 56. (In Russian).
  9. Sorokin A.A. Ideal creativity and human development // Questions of philosophy. — 2009. — No. 6. — P. 91. (In Russian).