2026, no. 2
SOCIETY. SCIENCE. EDUCATION

Information Warfare and Its Prospects in the Context of Globalization: The Case of the United States and China

Javlon A. AbdurasulovORCID, Dinora RuzimboyevaORCID

DOI 10.20339/am.02-26.108pp. 108–114UDC 327.8-042.4:004Open Access

PDF

  • 📄15Abdurasulov_Ruzimboyeva_АМ_2_2026.pdf320 KBDownload
Bookmark

Abstract

This article examines the emergence of the concept of information warfare within the context of globalization processes and analyzes its role in international relations. As one of the key instruments of geopolitical competition in the 21st century, information warfare is gaining increasing significance in the political, economic, and military strategies of states. The article explores the fundamental features of modern information warfare through the example of the informational rivalry between the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC). In particular, it analyzes the cyber strategies of these states and their interactions in the international arena. Furthermore, the study focuses on the forms and methods of information operations conducted through cybersecurity measures, disinformation campaigns, artificial intelligence, and media platforms. The research employs comparative, analytical, analogical, and retrospective methods to evaluate the strategic approaches of both countries toward achieving ‘information superiority’ from various perspectives.

References

  1. Wendt, Alexander. Social theory of International Politics. (1999). URL: https://www.guillaumenicaise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Wendt-Social-Theory-of-International-Politics.pdf

    guillaumenicaise.com
  2. Gafarov, I. Zamonaviy AQSH-Hindiston munosabatlarining konstruktivsit jihatlari. 2024 b. 8.

  3. Abdurasulov, J. Internal and external geopolitical factors affecting the formation of international relations in central Asia (case study of transport corridors and water resources usage). URL: https://almavest.ru/ru/archive/4230/5823

    almavest.ru
  4. Nye, J.S. (2002) Why military power is no longer enough. The Guardian, 2002, March 31.

  5. DemTech / Oxford Internet Institute. “China’s Public Diplomacy Operations: Understanding Engagement and Inauthentic Amplification of PRC Diplomats on Facebook and Twitter.” Ishchi qogʻoz, 2021. P. 15.

  6. NATO ACT (2021) Decision‐Making in the Age of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AC‐2020 Final Report), sah. 47. URL: https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/20210301

    act.nato.int
  7. U.S. Department of Defense. (2023) Department of Defense Cyber Strategy. URL: https://media.defense.gov/2023/Sep/12/2003299076/-1/-1/1/2023_DOD_Cyber_Strategy_Summary.pdf

    media.defense.gov
  8. Nye, J.S. (2011) The Future of Power. Carnegie Council. 10 February 2011. URL: https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/media/series/39/20110210-the-future-of-power

    carnegiecouncil.org
  9. CNBC. (2020, August 13). FCC declares Huawei, ZTE national security threats. URL: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/01/fcc-huawei-zte-officially-designated-national-security-threats.html

    cnbc.com
  10. U.S. – China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC). 2022 Annual Report to Congress — Chapter 3, Section 2: China’s Cyber Capabilities: Warfare, Espionage, and Implications for the United States. USCC. URL: https://www.uscc.gov/annual-report/2022-annual-report-congress

    uscc.gov
  11. Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). American Confidence in Elections: Prohibiting Foreign Interference. 18 December 2024. URL: https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/12/18/american-confidence-in-elections-prohibiting-foreign-interference/

    fdd.org
  12. Rid, T. (2020) Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare. Review in International Affairs, 97 (1): 244–258. Oxford University Press. URL: https://academic.oup.com/ia/article-abstract/97/1/244/6041478

    academic.oup.com
  13. Kott, A., Alberts, D.S., Wang, C. (2015) War of 2050: a Battle for Information, Communications, and Computer Security. arXiv preprint. URL: https://www.emergentmind.com/papers/1512.00360?utm_source

    emergentmind.com
  14. Drinhausen, S., Legarda, H. (2025) Reconfiguring International Security — The Strategic Evolution of Modern Warfare. Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik.URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12399-025-01018-9?utm_source

    link.springer.com
  15. Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge University Press, editors Michael N. Schmitt, Liis Vihul.