2013, no. 6
MANAGEMENT IN EDUCATION

Empirical analysis for Russian employees’ motivation to engage in professional education

Andrei Ankudinov, Oleg Lebedev

pp. 64–6880 RUB

PDF

Bookmark

Abstract

Results of econometric analysis for actual as well as planned participation of Russian employees in professional education programs are presented. Estimates provide comparative charasteristics of motivation to invest in advanced training in various branches of national economy.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Pischke J.S., 1999, Beyond Becker: Training in Imperfect Labour Markets, Economic Journal, 109 (Feb.), 112—142.
  2. Ballot, G., Fakhfakh F., Taymaz E., 2006, Who Benefits from Training and R&D, the Firm or the Workers?, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44 (3), 473– 495.
  3. Barron, J., Berger М., Black D., 1999, Do Workers Pay for On-The-Job Training, Journal of Human Resources, 34 (2), 235—252.
  4. Cameron, A., Trivedi, P. Microeconometrics Using Stata. Stata Press, Texas, 2009.
  5. Conti, G., 2005, Training, Productivity and Wages in Italy, Labour Economics, 12, 557—576.
  6. Lalonde, R., 1995, The Promise of Public Sector-Sponsored Training Programs, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 149—168.
  7. Loewenstein, M., Spletzer J., 1999, General and Specific Training: Evidence and Implications, Journal of Human Resources, 34 (4), 710—733.
  8. Long, J., Freese, J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. – Stata Press Publication, Texas, 2001.
  9. Manning, A. Monopsony in Motion, Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003.
  10. Stata Corp. Stata Base Reference Manual: Release 11.0. — Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, 2009.
  11. Stevens, M., 1994, A Theoretical Model of On-the-Job Training with Imperfect Competition, Oxford Economic Papers, 46 (4), 537—562.
  12. Wooldridge, J. M., Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach (2nd edition). — Mason: Thomson South-Western, 2002.