Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly
Sign inSign upJoin
Submit an articleSubmit
2026, no. 10
ECONOMY & MANAGEMENT IN SOCIAL SYSTEMS

FACTORS INFLUENCING HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DECISIONS IN MODERN UNIVERSITIES

Elizaveta V. Rakovich

DOI 10.20339/am.10-26.086pp. 86–94UDC 378:00580 RUB

PDF

Bookmark

Abstract

The article examines the multilevel determinants of human resource management decisions in modern universities. The study aims to provide a theoretical rationale for and further specify a four-component classification of factors influencing managerial choice: external factors, internal organizational factors, individual and group-level factors, and factors associated with uncertainty and risk. The methodological framework combines systems and institutional approaches, decision theory, organizational sociology, and the concept of bounded rationality. The study employs comparative and systems analysis, classification, and theoretical synthesis of contemporary Russian and international research. The findings show that external determinants define the institutional and resource boundaries of managerial choice; internal factors determine the organizational feasibility of available alternatives; and individual and group-level factors influence the interpretation of problem situations, the scope of discussion, and the final choice. Uncertainty and risk occupy a distinct position in the framework: information completeness and asymmetry, predictability of consequences, and managerial risk tolerance may modify the effects of other determinants, although treating them as moderators in the strict statistical sense requires separate empirical testing. The university context strengthens the interdependence of these factors because administrative hierarchy coexists with collegial governance, professional autonomy, a heterogeneous workforce, and complex interdepartmental communication. A multifactor model of the formation and implementation of university HR decisions is proposed, incorporating organizational and social consequences and feedback.

Keywords

  • managerial decision
  • human resources
  • higher education
  • university
  • organizational culture
  • group decision-making
  • uncertainty

References

  1. Agafonov, A.A., & Ponomarev, A.V. (2023). Agent-based modeling of collective decision-making in a small group: The role of a formal leader. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Systems Analysis and Information Technologies, 3, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.17308/sait/ 1995-5499/2023/3/5-16 (In Russian).
  2. Apenko, S.N., Efimova, G.Z., & Semenov, M.Yu. (2023). Formation and development of strategic project teams for university transformation: Methodological approaches. The Education and Science Journal, 25 (4), 37–69. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-4-37-69 (In Russian).
  3. Barkov, S.A., Markeeva, A.V., & Gavrilenko, O.V. (2024). Innovative bureaucracy in higher education management. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 24 (1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2024-24-1-58-72 (In Russian).
  4. Bezdudnaya, A.G., & Ivanov, E.D. (2025). Management of the human resource potential of a higher education institution. Leadership and Management, 12 (5), 1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.18334/ lim.12.5.123189 (In Russian).
  5. Germanov, I.A., Markova, Yu.S., & Bezrukov, A.V. (2020). The role of organizational culture and management practices in the development of trust in organizations: Russian and international research experience. Perm University Herald. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology, 4, 610–621. https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-4-610-621 (In Russian).
  6. Dezhina, I.G. (2024). Evolution of university autonomy and academic freedom in university teachers’ assessments. Higher Education in Russia, 33 (5), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-5-48-66 (In Russian).
  7. Dyachenko, E.L., & Mironenko, A.Yu. (2019). Academic leadership through the lens of managerialism: The relationship between university development and the rector’s academic specialization. Educational Studies Moscow, 1, 137–161. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-137-161 (In Russian).
  8. Dyatlov, A.V., & Kovalev, V.V. (2023). Effectiveness of higher education management in Russia in the practices of applying managerialist tools. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 14 (2), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.19181/ vis.2023.14.2.3 (In Russian).
  9. Zhdanov, P.A., Trostyanskaya, I.B., Barsukov, A.A., & Polikhina, N.A. (2019). Portrait of a modern rector: Competencies required in the global scientific and educational market. Educational Studies Moscow, 2, 129–
  10. Zborovsky, G.E. (2020). Can trust in Russian higher education be managed? Management Issues, 2 (63), 135–147. https://doi.org/ 10.22394/2304-3369-2020-2-135-147 (In Russian).
  11. Zborovsky, G.E., & Ambarova, P.A. (2024). Practices of managerial assessment of the resource potential of academic staff at universities. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 24 (3), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.22363/ 2313-2272-2024-24-3-715-733 (In Russian).
  12. Kalakutskaya, E.S., & Gavrilyuk, E.S. (2023). Decision-making in business under uncertainty. Scientific Journal of NRU ITMO. Series Economics and Environmental Management, 2 (53), 71–81. https://doi.org/ 10.17586/2310-1172-2023-16-2-71-81 (In Russian).
  13. Kirilina, T.Yu. (2022). System approach in management theory. Social and Humanitarian Technologies, 3 (23), 32–38. (In Russian).
  14. Kirilina, T.Yu., & Fedotova, T.V. (2023). Education management: Social and soft social technologies. Social and Humanitarian Technologies, 3 (27), 37–49. (In Russian).
  15. Kornienko, D.S., Baleva, M.V., & Yachmeneva, N.P. (2023). Risk choice: Intention versus action. Experimental Psychology, 16 (1), 87–100. https: //doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2023160105 (In Russian).
  16. Kochukhova, E.S. (2020). The academic profession through the eyes of university teachers. Educational Studies Moscow, 2, 278–302. https: //doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-278-302 (In Russian).
  17. Morozova, E.A., Golubitskaya, L.V., & Kochneva, O.P. (2023). Human resource potential of a regional education system: Concept and approaches to assessment. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences, 8 (1), 103–111. https://doi.org/ 10.21603/2500-3372-2023-8-1-103-111 (In Russian).
  18. Rogozin, D.M., Solodovnikova, O.B., & Ipatova, A.A. (2022). How university teachers perceive the digital transformation of higher education. Educational Studies Moscow, 1, 271–300. https://doi.org/10.17323/ 1814-9545-2022-1-271-300 (In Russian).
  19. Sokolov, M.M., Lopatina, S.L., & Yakovlev, G.A. (2018). From partnerships to institutions: Constitutional history of Russian universities. Educational Studies Moscow, 3, 120–145. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814- 9545-2018-3-120-145 (In Russian).
  20. Tikhomirov, A.A. (2025). The role of behavioral factors in managerial decision-making. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 3, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8647.2025.3.74954 (In Russian).
  21. Shrubchenko, A.V. (2016). Features of informal communications in a higher education institution. Vestnik of Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 5 (207), 9–16. (In Russian).
  22. Ershtein, L.B. (2021). Excessive workload of university teachers as a factor in the destruction of higher education in Russia. PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin, 2, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224- 9354/2021.2.6 (In Russian).
  23. de Boer, H., & Maassen, P. (2020). University governance and leadership in Continental Northwestern Europe. Studies in Higher Education, 45 (10), 2045–2053. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.202 0.1823640
  24. DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2095101
  25. Donaldson, J.F., & Graham, S.W. (1999). A Model of College Outcomes for Adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 50 (1), 24–40.
  26. Grossi, G., Dobija, D., & Strzelczyk, W. (2020). The Impact of Competing Institutional Pressures and Logics on the Use of Performance Measurement in Hybrid Universities. Public Performance & Management Review, 43 (4), 818–844.
  27. Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 349 p.
  28. Krauss, J., & Vanhove, A.J. (2022). Organizational culture perceptions and change frequency: The moderating effect of members’ hierarchical level in the organization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43 (2), 302–314.
  29. Simon, H.A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (1), 99–118. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1884852.
Rubrics
ECONOMY & MANAGEMENT IN SOCIAL SYSTEMS