Abstract
Specified are lacks in modern philosophy with offering the idea of noo-philosophy. Also analyzed are views of well-known Russian economist G.H. Popov on evolution of mankind. Proved is impossibility of development a new civilization on basis of humanitarian sciences. Instead of it variant of building noo-society on fundament of ecologically safe noo-technologies is offered.
Keywords
- new civilization
- information society
- person’s behavior
- noo-technologies
- noo-society
- noo-philosophy
References
- Dolnik, V.P. The disobedient child of biosphere: Conversations about the person in the company of birds and animals. — М: Pedagogics-Press Publ., 1994. — 208 p.
- Korsak, K.V. Noofuture of a civilisation, cultures, tutoring and education / National education. — 2011. — No. 7. — P. 42– 45.
- Korsak, Yu.K., Корсак, K.V. Occurrence nootechnologies as material resources positive eschatology and hopes of a sustainable development // Alma mater (Vestnik vysschei shkoly). — 2012. — No. 9. — P. 34–37.
- Lorentz, K. The double-faced Janus (aggression of the person) //Ecology and Life. — 2002. — No. 3. — P. 8–11.
- Nisbet, R. History of the Idea of Progress. — М.: IRISEN Publ., 2007. — 557 p.
- Popov, G. About a XXI century civilisation // Problems of Economy. — 2013. — No. 2. — P. 94–107.
- Russel, B. History of Western philosophy and it’s connection with political and social circumstances from the earliest times to the Present Day. — М.: Academic Project — Business Book, 2008. — 1008 p.
- Shtompka, P. Sociology. An analysis of a Modern Society. — М.: Logos, 2008. — 664 p.
- Ephroimson, V.P. History of The Altruism // Ecology and life. — 2002. — No. 3. — P. 11–14.