Abstract
Analyzing the worldwide intensification of ethnicity, the authors consider ethnos and nation not as mutually exclusive but as stably coexisting social groups. The differences between the phenomena of ethnos and nation are shown. It is concluded that the systemic crisis of the nation generated by globalization leads to a compensatory activation of ethnic social structures and ethnic consciousness.
Keywords
- globalization
- ethnos
- ethnicity
- nation
- nationality
- state
- social group
- identity
- structures of everyday life
References
- Tishkov V.A. Ethnos or ethnicity? / Ethnology and politics. Scientific journalism. — M.: Science, 2001. — 240 p. (In Russian).
- Lozansky E.D. Ethnoses and lobbyism in the United States. On the prospects of the Russian lobby in America. — M.: International Relations, 2004. — 272 p. (In Russian).
- Huntington S. The Erosion of American National Interests / Foreign Affairs. — 1997, Sept./Oct. — P. 35.
- Bromley Yu.V. To the question of the essence of the ethnos / Nature. — 1970, No. 2. — P. 51 — 55. (In Russian).
- Bromley Yu.V. Essays on the theory of ethnos. — M.: Book House "Librocom", 2009. — 440 p. (In Russian).
- Brodel F. Material civilization, economy and capitalism, XV — XVIII centuries. — Vol. 1. Structures of everyday life: possible and impossible. — M.: Progress, 1986. — 624 p. (In Russian).
- Tishkov V.A., Kisriev E.F. Multiple identities between theory and politics: an example of Dagestan // Ethnographic Review. — 2007. — No 5. — P. 96 — 115. (In Russian).