2019, no. 8
HERITAGE AND MODERNITY

“Kantian variations” as a field of self-awareness through the Other in the context of understanding the philosophy of M.K. Mamardashvili

N.V. Pashkova

DOI 10.20339/am.08-19.106pp. 106–109UDC 10180 RUB

PDF

Bookmark

Abstract

Examined are aspects of philosophy of I. Kant through the prism of the concept of understanding M.K. Mamardashvili. “Kantian variations” is the field of thought of the Other, on which contours of the method of interpretation of the text, discovered by Soviet scientist, synthesized into a single whole several traditions of philosophical hermeneutics. Fundamental basis in this sense should be considered as personal conditioning of understanding of another’s thought, extraction of one’s own experience and it’s use as supporting ontological point as condition for spiritual development of the subject. The article focuses not so much on philosophy of I. Kant, as on methodology, that allowed it to appear as reflection of spiritual (existential) experience of Koenigsberg thinker for the Other.

References

  1. Anikina, V.G. Ideas of M.K. Mamardashvili and cultural dialog understanding of reflection. Vestnik of Moscow university. Ser. 14. Psychology. 2015. No. 4. P. 114-121.

  2. Kuzemina, E.F., Pashkova, N.V. Nodtalgis for Person (anthropological turn in philosophy of M.K. Mamardashvili. Theory and practice of social development. 2011. No. 2. P. 17-21.

  3. Oznobkina, E.V. Thinking by Prust, thinking by Descartes, thinking by Kant. URL: https://www.mamardashvili.com/ru/merab-mamardashvili/opyty-chteniya/elena-oznobkina/myslit-prustom-myslit-dekartom-myslit-kantom

    mamardashvili.com
  4. Mamardashvili, M.K. Kantian variations. URL: https://royallib.com/read/mamardashvili_merab/kantianskie_variatsii.html#0

    royallib.com
  5. Padjett, A. Dasein and the philosopher: responsibility in Heidegger and Mamardashvili. Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology. 2007. No. 1. P. 1-21.