2020, no. 11
SOCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY

State measures and researches to support Russian entrepreneurship in the context of COVID-crisis

V.K. Levashov, I.S. Shushpanova, A.V. Anishchenko

DOI 10.20339/am.11-20.092pp. 92–102UDC 316.4+338.180 RUB

PDF

Bookmark

Abstract

Researched are social and political effects of the COVID-crisis, having significant impact on all spheres of Russian civil society and the rule of law. Under the current conditions, Russian entrepreneurship and small and medium-sized businesses are under the threat of unforeseen challenges in the economy, and the risks of bankruptcy and unemployment have increased to their maximum in recent years. To understand the causes and content of the processes occurring in the economy, it becomes relevant to analyze the adequacy and effectiveness of state measures of social, political and economic support from the point of view of entrepreneurs themselves, who make a specific contribution to the country’s economy and provide jobs and wages for employees. Establishing feedback and dialogue in the interaction of business and government is a problem area for using state support tools. The research results showed that more than half of the enterprises were not included in the list of affected industries compiled by the authorities, and the support measures proposed by the state proved to be unavailable or ineffective for promptly solving the current problems of the majority of Russian entrepreneurs. The article examines the reserves and opportunities for improving the effectiveness of state support measures for Russian entrepreneurship.

Funding

Статья подготовлена в рамках государственного задания No 0137-2019-0037 «Социологический мониторинг “Как живешь, Россия”»?

Award
0137-2019-0037

References

  1. Zemtsov, S.P., Tsareva, Yu.V. Trends in the development of the small and medium-sized enterprises sector in the context of the pandemic and crisis. Russian economic development. 2020. No. 5: P. 71–82.

  2. Isaeva, I.A. Anti-Crisis measures of state financial support of business entities. Scientific and practical research. 2020. No. 5-4 (28). P. 37–42.

  3. Korolev, V.K., Evgraphova, O.V. The “Decoronation” of Globalization and Ethnomulticulturalism in the Post-Crisis Economy. Economy Philosophy. 2020. No. 3. P. 44–59.

  4. Malofeev, S.N. Modern technologies of formation of financial resources of small business. Economics and entrepreneurship. 2020. No. 5 (118). P. 695–699.

  5. Nizhegorodtsev, R.M. Coronacrisis: The Virus-Digital Economy Arising. Economy Philosophy. 2020. No. 3. P. 125–152.

  6. Sergienko, N.S. State support for small and medium-sized businesses in the context of the coronavirus pandemic: the experience of developed countries. Economics and entrepreneurship. 2020. No. 5 (118). P. 752–755.

  7. Tebekin, A.V. On the depth of the crisis of 2020 for the world and national economies and ways out of it. Journal of economic research. 2020. No. 2. P. 52–71.

  8. Fukuyama, F. The Pandemic and Political Order. 2020. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2020-06-09/pandemic-and-political-order

    foreignaffairs.com