2024, no. 8
PHILOSOPHY & SOCIOLOGY

Empirical Study of Egocentrism as a Form of Deviant Behavior in Development of Personality’s Moral Sphere

Aleksey A. OschepkovORCID, Elena N. PiskunovaORCID

DOI 10.20339/am.08-24.031pp. 31–40UDC 316.6+159.9Open Access

PDF

  • 📄5_Ощепков_Пискунова_AM_24_8.pdf341 KBDownload
Bookmark

Abstract

The relevance of study of egocentrism role in moral sphere development is conditioned by the necessity of deeper comprehension of interrelation between moral development and human social behavior determined by problematics related to deviant behavior manifestation. Due to this, the given article is directed to revelation of egocentrism features of young people and their relation to deviant behavior. To solve this task the empirical study, the main method of which became psychological techniques of egocentrism level diagnostics, of proneness to deviant behavior and techniques of values orientations system study, presenting the possibility to study personal features as integrated mark in relation to the possibility of deviant behavior revelation, was conducted. The study sample was composed by students of Dimitrovgrad engineering-technological institute — branch of NRNU MEPhI, in the age of 18–20 years, at the amount of 54 people (27 boys and 27 girls). Thanks to the conducted empirical study it was revealed that mechanism of interrelation between young people egocentrism and deviant behavior lies in the fact that they discover misrepresentation of self, and for them the overvaluation of own quantities is characteristic, at the same time there is little agreement of society ideas about themselves. Thus development of personality with egocentrism high level testifies deformation of development of communications to the people around, that causes difficulties in interactions to people. The presented results may be put in the basis of design of psychological-pedagogical program of preventing deviant behavior of young people.

References

  1. Carpendale, J.I.M., Racine, T.P. Intersubjectivity and egocentrism: Insights from the relational perspectives of Piaget, Mead, and Wittgenstein. New Ideas in Psychology. 2011, vol.29, no. 3, pp. 346–354. https://doi:10.10.16/j.newideapsych.2010.03/005

  2. Habermas, J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992. 225 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/moralconsciousne0000habe

    archive.org
  3. Kesselring, T., Muller, U. The concept of egocentrism in the context of Piaget’s theory. New Ideas in Psychology. 2011, no. 29, pp. 327–347. https://doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.008

    DOI 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.008
  4. Kohlberg, L., Colby, A. The measurement of moral judgment: Theoretical foundations and research validation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, 398 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=YUhdVqLr5YMC&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s

    books.google.ru
  5. Gibbs, J.C. Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2009, 376 p. https://doi:10.4135/9781452233604

    DOI 10.4135/9781452233604
  6. Piaget, J. The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987, 160 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/equilibrationofc0000piag

    archive.org
  7. Hoffman, M.L. Empathy and prosocial behavior. Handbook of emotions. New York: Guildford Press, 2008. URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Empathy-and-prosocial-behavior.-Hoffman/b2f7c9281753505a3bb1c10f5d6998416b0bcfc7

    semanticscholar.org
  8. Arnett, J. Drunk driving, sensation seeking, and egocentrism among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences.1990, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 541–546. URL: https://archive.org/details/sim_personality-and-individual-differences_1990_11_contents_0

    archive.org
  9. Chambers, J.R., De Dreu, C.K.W. Egocentrism drives misunderstanding in conflict and negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014, vol. 51, pp.15-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.001

    DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.001
  10. Chambers, J.R., Suls, J. The role of egocentrism and focalism in the emotion intensity bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2007, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 618–625. https://doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.002

    DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.002
  11. Savitsky, K., Keysar, B., Epley, N., Carte, T., Swanson, A. The closeness-communication bias: Increased egocentrism among friends versus strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 269–273. https://doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.005

    DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.005
  12. Kruger, J., Windschitl, P.D., Burrus, J., Fessel, F., Chambers, J.R. The rational side of egocentrism in social comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2008, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 220–232. https://doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.001

    DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.001
  13. Blackman, S.F., Keller, K.T., Cooper, J. Egocentrism and vicarious dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2016, vol. 62, pp. 1–6. https://doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.001

    DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.001
  14. Fokina, A.V. Social egocentrism as a component of adolescent deviance. Psychological science and education. 2004, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 20–29. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9130916

    elibrary.ru
  15. Tinigina, A.A. Modern studies of egocentrism in the context of social perception and communication. Social psychology and society. 2013, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 29-38. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18908653

    elibrary.ru
  16. Pashukova, T.I. Egocentrism in students during the period of socio-psychological adaptation to study at a university. Vestnik of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and pedagogical sciences. 2019, no. 1 (830), pp. 223–235. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/egotsentrizm-u-studentov-v-period-sotsialno-psihologicheskoy-adaptatsii-k-obucheniyu-vuze

    cyberleninka.ru
  17. Pashukova, T.I., Panfilova, E.M. Egocentrism and characterological features of personality in the period of early adulthood. Vestnik of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Education and pedagogical sciences. 2020, no. 3 (836), pp. 235–251. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44264961

    elibrary.ru
  18. Toporkova, Ya.A. The phenomenon of egocentrism in adolescent schoolchildren: a theoretical aspect. Youth and systemic modernization of the country: a collection of scientific articles of the 7th International scientific conference of students and young scientists. Kursk, 2022. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38179817

    elibrary.ru
  19. Yadov, V.A. Self-Regulation and Prediction of Personal Social Behavior: Dispositional Concept. Moscow: CSPiM, 2013, 376 p. URL: https://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=2754

    isras.ru
  20. Devyatkin, A.A. The Phenomenon of Social Attitude in the Psychology of the 20th Century: Monograph. Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad University, 1999, 309 p. URL: http://window.edu.ru/resource/732/22732/files/devatkin.pdf

    window.edu.ru
  21. Vorauer, J.D., Petsnik, C., Quesnel, M.S. Who brings you up when you’re feeling down? Distinct implications of dispositional empathy versus situationally-prompted empathic mindsets for targets' affective experience in face-to-face interpersonal interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2020, vol. 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103991

    DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103991
  22. Bulle, N. Vygotsky versus Dewey on mental causation: The core of two divergent conceptions of human thought. New Ideas in Psychology. 2021, vol. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100898.

    DOI 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100898
  23. Uznadze, D.N. Psychology of set. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2001, 416 p. URL: https://bookree.org/reader?file=596941

    bookree.org
  24. Shihirev, P.N. Modern social psychology. Moscow: IP RAN, 2000, 447 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000656528.

    search.rsl.ru
  25. Kozachenko, H.H., Piazza, J. How children and adults value different animal livesю Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2021, vol. 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204

    DOI 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204
  26. Leontiev, D.A. Values and value representations in individual and group consciousness: types, determinants and changes in time. Psychological review. 1998, no. 1. pp. 13–25. URL: https://istina.msu.ru/publications/article/1120362/

    istina.msu.ru
  27. Schwarz, S.H. Basic individual values: sources and consequences. Handbook of value. Oxford: UK, Oxford University press, 2015, 38 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277718092_Schwartz_S_H_2015_Basic_individual_values_Sources_and_consequences_In_D_Sander_and_T_Brosch_Eds_Handbook_of_value_Oxford_UK_Oxford_University_Press

    researchgate.net
  28. Karandashev, V.N. Schwartz Methodology in the Study of Personal Values: Concept and Methodological Guide. Saint Petersburg: Rech, 2004, 70 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01002512231

    search.rsl.ru
  29. Rean, A.A. Psychology of cognition by the teacher of the personality of students. Moscow: Highest school, 1990, 202 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001550865

    search.rsl.ru
  30. Shapar, V.B. Practical psychology. Psychodiagnostics of groups and collectives. Rostov n/D.: Phoenix, 2006, 448 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01002957425

    search.rsl.ru